Student/Aspirants are hereby cautioned that deceptively similar names to that of Chanakya IAS Academy Group is being used by some unaffiliated entities having no association with us and legal actions have already been initiated against a few of them.All students must verify authenticity of the academy /study centre/institute before enrolling and are requested to inform us of any such institute functioning under a deceptively similar name by calling on 09650299662/3/4 or sending email at firstname.lastname@example.org.Please be informed that the academies/study centres/institutes with the Chanakya IAS Academy Group are as per the list.
SC to hear plea for independent judicial appointments commission with role to public
SC to hear plea for independent judicial appointments commission with role to public [Judiciary]
The Supreme Court said it is likely to hear a petition seeking the formation a “public, transparent body”, neither controlled by government nor the judiciary, for appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts of the country.
A Bench agreed to hear National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms, represented by advocates Mathew J. Nedumpara and A.C. Philip, after they made an urgent mentioning highlighting the “nepotism and favouritism” prevalent in the Collegium system of judges appointing judges.
The apex court’s agreeability to hear the petition comes at a time when Justice J. Chelameswar, Supreme Court judge and Collegium and lone dissenter of the October 16, 2015 NJAC judgment, wrote to the Chief Justice his decision to skip Collegium meetings till a transparent mechanism is ushered in.
In a strong critique of the NJAC judgment, the petition sought for a judicial declaration from the Supreme Court that the verdict “killed” the fundamental right of an “ordinary lawyer” to be considered a judge and thus closing the door to reform in judiciary.
The judgment has perpetuated the zone of consideration of judgeship to the few powerful and privileged who have either political connections, who are well-heeled or who have their kith and kin in the higher echelons of the judiciary.
“No mechanism in substitution thereof, which will provide for a just, fair, open and non-discriminatory selection and appointment of Judges from a diverse and wider pool of candidates than the traditional ones, namely, the kith and kin of Judges, their near and dear ones, has been brought into existence and that the proposed Memorandum of Procedure, which seeks to provide for a non-statutory, if not secretive, eligibility criteria and procedure, is violative of Part III of the Constitution,” the petition argued.
The judgment has hurt “the concept of democratic legitimacy in the matter of appointment of Judges to the higher judiciary”.
A Judicial Appointment Commission which will be independent of both the executive and the judiciary to select Judges for the higher judiciary by inviting applications from all eligible candidates, invite references from all stakeholders, the Bar Associations, the public at large.