Chanakya IAS Academy Blog

The article talks about the extinction threat faced by Great Indian Bustard due to developmental projects and need to balance growth with wildlife conservation.

  • Bijli-sadak-paani are the basic needs for a decent quality of rural life. Villages in the remote grasslands and deserts of India have long suffered and lacked these amenities.
  • But times are changing. Quality of life for ‘humans’ is improving but it is going down for other species such as the Great Indian Bustard, an ambassador of grasslands and deserts, was once widespread across the dry rural landscapes of India. It has now disappeared from 90 per cent of its former range.
  • Justifiably, electricity, road and water facilities for rural households are the main agenda for development programmes. The present government has a target of electrifying seven lakh power deprived villages with mazes of power lines.
  • About 1.7 lakh villages will be connected by constructing and upgrading 7.5 lakh kilometres of roads. The water needs of 80,000 sq km of agricultural land will be quenched through funding for irrigation projects. Bijli-sadak-pani will finally reach remote rural households.
  • However, this change has come at a cost to wildlife conservation. Many remote rural landscapes are also important wildlife habitats.
  • The influx of infrastructure has modified these lands and wildlife is not amenable to such rapid changes.
  • The expanding infrastructure in grasslands and deserts has been a death knell for the Great Indian Bustard.
  • With just 200 bustards left, they are precariously close to extinction. Landscape transformation by basic amenities with other factors are responsible for this.
  • There is a change in farming practices as a perennial water supply (brought by the Indira Gandhi Nahar Project in Thar and by bore-well irrigation in Kutch) ensures land is cultivated intensively all through the year. Earlier, farming was only done during monsoons and this spared lands for bustards, antelopes and foxes.
  • Mazes of power lines are laid along aerial corridors. Bustards are on a collision course as they have narrow frontal vision that does not allow easy spotting of wires and being not very agile flyers they have poor manoeuvring skills.
  • Mathematical projections based on the bustards’ demography found that these accidental deaths are sufficient to cause bustards to go extinct. Yet, prime bustard habitats between Sam and Mokla in Thar and between Naliya and Bitta in Kutch are allocated for wind and solar power projects.
  • In a final effort to save the bustard, conservation agencies have joined hands to restore its habitats and secure a captive bred population as an insurance against extinction. But reviving the bustard requires the importance of grasslands and deserts to be recognised.
  • Indian environmental laws mandate that infrastructure projects be scrutinised on the basis of environment impact assessments before granting clearances. Safeguards are suggested to reduce ecological damage, and their implementation is monitored.
  • The problem is that forest-centric environmental governance does not recognise grasslands and deserts as worthy of conservation attention. This is an imprinted notion that is derived from an archaic colonial policy.
  • Grasslands and deserts were not regarded as resources for the British economy — the notion of unproductive “wastelands” that are better diverted to “more productive” uses continues to this day.
  • But grasslands and deserts support biodiversity that is so unique that their loss cannot be compensated by conserving forests. The 11th Five-Year Plan recommended that grasslands and deserts be brought under the ambit of environment impact assessment and consolidation of these habitats as “protected areas”.
  • The second policy shortfall was the sole focus on “protected areas” which neglects the protection of birds outside these areas.
  • Many voices call for conservation policy to transcend “protected areas” and to manage land uses in “unprotected” biodiversity-rich areas.
  • The way forward need not be viewed through a lens of “this or that” — whether bijli-sadak-pani or conservation; development or environmental laws; protected or unprotected.
  • It is more often a question of where and how to implement infrastructures in rural-wildlife habitats while trying to meet wildlife concerns.
  • Rajasthan has pioneered the initiative of participatory land-use planning in bustard habitats.
  • There is no doubt that balancing rural development and bustard conservation is one of the most formidable challenges we face. By confronting this challenge, we are at the tipping point for how land-use planning and environmental stewardship is possible in other parts of India.

Question:

Justifiably, electricity, road and water facilities for rural households are the main agenda for development programmes. But, many remote rural landscapes are also important wildlife habitats. The influx of infrastructure has modified these lands and wildlife is not amenable to such rapid changes. The way forward can only be a choice between development and environment conservation. Illustrate.

Suggested Approach:

  • Infrastructure development is necessary and usually it leads modification of habitat.
  • Example of Great Indian Bustard in Rajasthan.
  • We need balanced and sustainable development.

Link:http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/rural-development-wildlife-protection-encroachment-great-indian-bustard-3023034/

English: Download

Hindi: Download

Read 466 times Last modified on Saturday, 10 September 2016 10:40
Login to post comments